Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/[edit]

From And "The twitter account does show a link to the website of the president. The copyright statement on the president website is not compatible with the GODL-India license template on Commons, as it states ‘’This contents of this website may not be reproduced partially or fully, without due permission from The President of India, If referred to as a part of another publication, the source must be appropriately acknowledged. The contents of this website can not be used in any misleading or objectionable context.’’ So copying work or making derivative works is not allowed it seems, from the website, but probably the same will be true for the twitter account. " (Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Kovind presented Nari Shakti Puraskar to Jodhaiya Bai Baiga.jpg)

A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment: The GODL-India is an act of parliament, which supersedes a mere (procedural/formal/old) text on the website. User4edits (talk) 06:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If Indian government engages in copyfraud it should be at least clarified at file pages what is going on, not just GODL template plastered without explanation Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:36, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep: As far as most of the images mentioned here are concerned, all have been taken by in-house photographers of the Rashtrapati Bhavan, therefore I do not understand the point of copyfraud for photos relating to the in-house event of the Presidential residence. Thank you User4edits (talk) 02:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Yea! What they said. I'm not going to give any extra attention at this attempt to damage the project based on a random web comment. The law is the law. There are thousands more images you can list here, but the argument remains the same. Why??? Victuallers (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"The law is the law." and it should be documented on images why given law actually applies. Delete in the current form. For example right now fail to explain why free license applies Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the rationale for deletion is "fail to explain why free license applies" please do specify what else is needed apart from the GODL-India template. In those two cases you mention, the picture is taken from the "Official Twitter account of Rashtrapati Bhavan" which "is run by the President’s Secretariat". So why would the GODL-India template which says it "applies to all shareable non-sensitive data available either in digital or analog forms but generated using public funds by various agencies of the Government of India" and "all users are provided a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to use, adapt, publish (either in original, or in adapted and/or derivative forms), translate, display, add value, and create derivative works (including products and services), for all lawful commercial and non-commercial purposes, and for the duration of existence of such rights over the data or information" not apply in this case? Mujinga (talk) 10:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep per User4edits and Victuallers. I notice File:Arti Rana receives the Nari Shakti Puraskar.jpg was already deleted, and should be reinstated since the rationale "(Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): source – Twitter)" was incorrect. Mujinga (talk) 10:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment - previous discussions which resulted in similar images being kept: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vanita Jagdeo Borade receives the Nari Shakti Puraskar.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ms. Gauri Maulekhi - -NariShakti Puraskar 2017 Awardee (Individual).jpg Mujinga (talk) 11:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The first DR was ended up deleting the file. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for that - I linked the wrong discussion and as you didn't state, the one I did link (now struck) was a no-brainer for deletion since it was a duplicate. No response on what three editors have now pointed out, namely that your rationale for deletion is wrong? Mujinga (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: Procedural keep. As I have said before, I am uncomfortable with deciding what is and what isn't covered by the GODL in these individual DRs. There needs to be a consensus on the license talk page or village pump or somewhere that's more visible than a DR before we look at individual files. holly {chat} 18:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]